Greek and Christian Models of the Truth Essay -- Philosophy Religion E

Greek and Christian Models of the Truth In his Philosophical Fragments, Sã ¸ren Kierkegaard, composing under the nom de plume Johannes Climacus, offers the conversation starter, How far does the Truth concede to being scholarly? (154). A more straightforward and brief definition of Climacus' inquiry is The means by which is the Truth learned? since his inquiry doesn't concern the degree of human information, which How far suggests, however the potential modes through which one comes, or may come, to know the Truth. For Climacus, there are two potential methods of knowing, or two hypotheses of how one comes to know the Truth: the Greek and the Christian. Both of these modes lead one not to realities, however to the Truth; Climacus' anxiety isn't with those methods of realizing that yield specific certainties about the world and people, as in science, yet with those modes that yield extreme Truth, that most noteworthy and most flawless dream of reasoning. The focal reason for this consideration on the two methods of knowing the Truth, as indicated by Niels Thulstrup, is to bring up the profound basic distinction among Platonism and Christianity as a result of the reality of the manifestation (lxxxvii). Climacus needs to exhibit that the Greek, Platonic, or Socratic method of realizing the Truth repudiates the Christian method of knowing reality. Numerous scholars and logicians hold that Climacus prevails in his exhibit and subsequently praise the virtuoso of Kierkegaard. My perusing of Climacus' Task of Thought is additionally that he succeeds, yet that his prosperity is a key disappointment. For despite the fact that Climacus demonstrates a fundamental distinction between the Greek method of knowing the Truth and the Christian, he doesn't completely perceive that his entire idea venture is itself Greek, and that it puts a q... ... strategy accomplishes more, be that as it may, than just put an inquiry to Christianity which it doesn't and can't reply: By creating an answer from a misreading of Christian disclosure, Climacus contorts the idea of Christianity and Christian disclosure. Works Cited Ellul, Jacques. The Subversion of Christianity. Trans. Geoffrey W. Bromiley. Fabulous Rapids: Eerdmans, 1986. Kierkegaard, Soren. Philosophical Fragments. A Kierkegaard Anthology. Ed. Robert Bretall. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1946. 153-171. Nielsen, H.A. Where the Passion Is: A Reading of Kierkegaard's Philosophical Fragements. Tallahassee: University Presses of Florida, 1983. Thulstrup, Niels. Observer's Introduction. Philosophical Fragments. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1962. xlv-xcii. Tillich, Paul. A History of Christian Thought. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1968.